Blumberg P. Developing Learner-Centered Teaching. A Practical Guide for Faculty. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA, 2009.
Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How People Learn. Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000.
Fink L D: Creating Significant Learning Experiences. An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA, 2003.
Huba ME, Freed JE. Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses. Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Allyn & Bacon. Boston. 2000.
Myers C, Jones TB. Promoting Active Learning. Strategies for the College Classroom. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA, 1993.
Silberman A. 101 Ways to Make Training Active. 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
Simkins S, Maier MH. Just-in-Time-Teaching. Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, Sterling VA, 2010.
Thomas PA: Step 4. Educational Strategies. Chapter 5. In: Curriculum Development for Medical Education. A Six-Step Approach. 2nd Edition. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT (Editors). Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. 2009.
Weimer M. Learner-Centered Teaching. Five Key Changes to Practice. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, 2002.
Cameron VL: Teaching advanced genetics without lectures. Genetics. 165:945-950, 2003.
Carvalho H: Active teaching and learning for a deeper understanding of physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 33:132-133, 2009.
Cherney ID: The effects of active learning on students' memories for course content. Active Learning in Higher Education 9(2) 152-171, 2008.
Chickering AW, Gamson ZF: Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7):3-7, 1987.
Crowe A, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP: Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology CBE Life Sci Educ.7(4): 368–381, 2008.
DeBourgh GA: Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice 8:76-87, 2008.
Doucet M, Vrins A, Harvey D: Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students. Medical Teacher 31: e570-e579, 2009.
Freeman S, O'Connor E, Parks JW, Cunningham M, Hurley D, Haak D, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP: Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 6:132-139, 2007.
Gauci SA, Dantas AM, Williams DA, Kemm RE: Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Adv Physiol Educ 33:60-71, 2009.
Gonzalez HL, Palencia AP, Umana LA, Galindo L, Villafrade M LA: Mediated learning experience and concept maps: a pedagogical tool for achieving meaningful learning in medical physiology students. Adv Physiol Educ 32: 312-316, 2008.
Graffam B: Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Medical Teacher 29:38-42, 2007.
Hoskins SG, Stevens LM: Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less is more in teaching science. Adv Physiol Educ 33:17-20, 2009.
Knight JK, Wood WB: Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol Educ 4:298-310, 2005.
Krontiris-Litowitz J: Using truncated lectures, conceptual exercises, and manipulatives to improve learning in the neuroanatomy classroom. Adv Physiol Educ 32:152-156, 2008.
Lord TR: 101 reasons for using cooperative learning in biology teaching. Amer Biol Teacher 63(1): 30-38, 2001.
Luckie DB, Maleszewski JJ, Loznak SD, Krha M: Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning: a four-year study of "Teams and Streams". Adv Physiol Educ 287:199-209, 2004.
Meltzer DE, Manivannan K: Transforming the lecture-hall environment: the fully interactive physics lecture. Am J Phys 70(6):639-654, 2002.
Michael J: Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ 30: 159-167; 2006.
Preszler RW, Dawe A, Shuster CB, Shuster M: Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. Cell Biol Educ 6:29-41, 2007.
Prince M: Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Engr Education 93(3): 223-231; 2004.
Schackow TE, Chavez M, Loya L, Friedman M: Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medicine. Family Medicine 36: 496-504, 2004.
Silverthorn DU: Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. Adv Physiol Educ 30: 135-140, 2006.
Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT: Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. J Engr Educ January 1-15, 2005.
Smith MK, Wood WB, Adams WK, Wieman C, Knight JK, Guild N, Su TT: Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323: 122-124, 2009.
Springer L, Stanne ME, Donovan SS: Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 21-51, 1999.
Active Learning & Long Term Retention
Cortright RN, Collins HL, Rodenbaugh DW, DiCarlo SE: Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Adv Physiol Educ 27(3):102-108, 2003.
Francis GE, Adams JP, Noonan EJ: Do they stay fixed? Physics Teacher 36:488-490, 1998.
Halpern DF, Hakel MD: Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond. Teaching for long-term retention and transfer. Change 35(4) July/August: 36-41 2003.
Bonwell CC, Eison JA: Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. The National Teaching & Learning Forum. http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/91-9dig.htm (accessed 3/6/09)
Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Stanne MB: Cooperative learning methods: a meta-analysis. http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl-methods.html
National Calls for Reform in Education:
DiCarlo SE: Cell biology should be taught as science is practiced. Nature Reviews Mol Cell Biol 7: 290-296, 2006.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. A Nation at Risk: the Imperative for Reform. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1983. (the first of many calls for reform of K-12 science education in the US)
Association of American Medical Colleges. Physicians for the Twenty-First Century, the GPEP Report. Washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1984. (AAMC call for significant changes in the teaching of basic sciences to medical students)
National Research Council on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century. BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington DC: National Academy, 2003.