Ph.D. Dissertation
         TECHNOLOGY
        SELECTION AND MARKETING ACTIVITIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION PATENTING AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 
        Abstract:  Technology transfer
        between academic institutions and private industry represents an important means for
        growth in the economy as well as an important and growing revenue stream for
        universities.  Still, as a relatively new phenomenon in the United States (mainly
        dating back to the 1980 passage of the Bayh-Dole Act) many questions remain concerning the
        optimal level of institutional support to be provided by university offices of technology
        transfer.  This study investigated marketing practices employed by successful (in
        terms of licensing revenues earned) institutional offices of technology
        transfer.    In addition, this study investigated decision-making about
        which new technology to patent and whether profitability and benefit to humanity factored
        into the decisions.  
        The directors (or a
        directors designee) of institutional offices of technology transfer were interviewed
        via semi-structured interviews, and the common factors related to technology transfer
        success were used to generate a comparative perspective on academic technology
        transfer.  In particular, it was discovered that the formulas for the faculty share
        of royalty income varied widely and highly successful institutions had generous royalty
        sharing formulas.  Also, while the combined list of marketing services offered by
        institutional offices of technology transfer is impressive, most of the institutions
        surveyed were actively working to expand their marketing efforts.  
        When considering new inventions
        or technology for patenting, an overwhelming majority of the top technology transfer
        institutions cited commercial potential as the main criteria.  Further, commercial
        potential was considered analogous to public benefit.  As a related finding, the
        mission of making technologies available to society was growing in importance.   
        In the area of innovations, the
        use of collaboration or partnerships to bundle intellectual property for the purposes of
        creating more salable or valuable technology was becoming more widely
        practiced.   
        Finally, as evidenced by
        their contacts with the institutional offices of technology transfer, potential new
        faculty hires were becoming increasingly interested in factoring in institutional support
        for technology transfer in advance of accepting a new academic position.  
        Other Research Interests
        Additional research interests
        include: ethical education of business leaders; value economics (read:  
		including ethical and social responsibility considerations in economic 
		analysis and decision making); 
		efficacy of distance education pedagogy; and the economics and finance of higher
        education.   
         |