(Document in Progress)
General introduction | Special situations | |
Categories of geographic headings | Verifying and establishing geographic headings |
Geographic headings for place names may appear in geographic subject headings or as all or part of corporate body headings (as a government heading or as the government at the beginning of a government body heading). The primary focus of this document will be on geographic subject headings. The first two sections are intended primarily for copy cataloguers; the third section, "Special situations," contains information of interest to original cataloguers.
For additional information on geographic headings, see Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., chapter 23, and the Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings, sections H690-H1055.
For additional information on qualifying geographic names and using them in geographic subdivision, see also “Geographic Headings and Subdivisions: A Summary of Contrasting Structures.”
MARC Tagging:
Categories of geographic headings
There are two broad categories of geographic headings. The rules for the form of a geographic heading vary to some extent depending on the category.
Political jurisdictions |
Non-jurisdictional headings |
The form of access point should be the same regardless of the function in a given bib record, whether it represents a responsible body or a subject, a government or a geographic area. The basic rules for the construction of geographic jurisdictions are covered in AACR2 revised, Chapter 23, and its associated LCRI. Additional rules appear in the Subject Cataloging Manual.
Today, jurisdictions are set up as name authority records, with 010 record number prefix “n.” Historically, however, they were sometimes set up as subject authority records, depending on the situation and the LC division (Descriptive Cataloging or Subject Cataloging) where they first came up. Subject authority records have the 010 record number prefix “sh.” While LC has made an effort to merge duplicate name and subject authority records for jurisdictions, you will sometimes find duplicate authority records for them.
NACO libraries (including Tulane) may establish jurisdictional headings (NACO records have 010 prefixes beginning with “n,” e.g., “no” and “nr”).
Please note: As a government, a jurisdictional heading may also appear as the first element of a government body heading.
Government body headings are treated according to rules and guidelines for corporate name headings, not geographic headings. For corporate body authority work for OCLC-member copy, see "Summary of Interim Procedures for OCLC-Member Copy Authority Work."
Examples include:
Some general features of non-jurisdictional headings:
<Distinctive part of name>, <Generic term> (<Qualifier>) |
or |
<Distinctive part of name> <Generic term> (<Qualifier>) |
For information on qualifiers, see the Subject Cataloging Manual, H810, and "Geographic Headings and Subdivisions."
Note: This pattern applies to entities with a known English-language name, so use of the comma in headings with generic terms may appear inconsistent.
The generic term is usually translated into English if it is in a foreign language. The generic term is still placed at the end of the name, but no comma is used to show inversion.
Exceptions to translating the generic term: If:
However, if an initial article is used in a name in English-speaking countries, it is retained. The English “The” is inverted.
Special situations: In Progress
Name changes | Archaeological sites | Russia and Soviet Union | ||
Extinct cities | Islands | Parks, Reserves, Gardens, etc. |
The appropriate heading or headings to use in your record may depend on:
Therefore, historical jurisdictions — cities, kingdoms, or other jurisdictions that existed in the past but that no longer survive — may sometimes be valid as subject headings but sometimes only as name headings, with a modern name used in the subject heading. Please check carefully all 667 and 680 scope notes in geographic authority records.
(For extinct, ruined cities, see below, Extinct cities.)
In subject cataloguing:
SUBJECT USAGE: This heading is not valid for use as a subject. Works about this place are entered under <later name>. |
LC refers to this straightforward type of name change as a linear name change.
The heading "Germany" is used for works on:
In contrast, for example, the heading "Germany (East)" is used for works on:
Cities in the Western Hemisphere that ceased to exist by 1500, i.e., Pre-Columbian settlements, are treated as archaeological sites. In the Eastern Hemisphere, the distinction between an extinct city and an archaeological site is not always hard-and-fast; it can sometimes depend on the reference sources consulted at the time that a heading is established.
To meet the definition of an extinct city, there should not have been both geographic and chronological continuity with a town or city that existed after 1500. If a settlement known by an ancient name developed into a modern community, with the exact site continuously occupied, the heading for the modern community should be used, with the ancient name as a cross-reference.
Heading: | 151 Paris (France) |
Cross-reference: | 451 Lutetia (France) |
[the cross-reference uses “France” as the qualifier simply because the heading does] |
On the other hand, if a city became ruined and abandoned, then another settlement happened to be established in or spread into the same place later — in other words, there was no chronological continuity — an extinct city heading is valid:
If an extinct city is not located in the same place as a modern one of the same name — in other words, there is no geographic continuity — two separate headings are also justified.
Extinct cities are usually established as subject headings. They may occasionally be valid as name headings, when use as a main or added entry is appropriate.
For the use of qualifiers with extinct cities and their use in geographic subdivision, see “Geographic Headings and Subdivisions: Extinct cities.”
Archaeological sites are generally established using the term “Site” and an appropriate qualifier. (See also “Geographic Headings and Subdivisions: Archaeological sites.”
A distinctively named archaeological site that happens to be located within a modern city should be established as a site, qualified by the heading for the city. Research is sometimes needed to determine whether a separate site heading is needed, or whether the heading for a modern settlement should be used, with the subdivision “$x Antiquities.”
On the other hand, sites located outside of modern settlements should be established separately, even if the names are the same.
A site that is called “Cave,” “Rockshelter,” or “Mound” should be established using the word “Cave” or “Mound” rather than “Site.”
Middle Eastern archaeological mound sites, a category known as “tell” (a common romanization) or “tall” (standard LC romanization), are often established using a form of this term, unless the site qualifies as an extinct city.
In practice, a few other (often fairly well known) archaeological sites have been established without a “Site” qualifier.
While many islands are jurisdictions in their own right --
-- others are simply geographic features that are part of jurisdictions.
The main complications relating to island headings involve the appropriate qualifier and use in geographic subdivision. For more information on these topics, see “Geographic Headings and Subdivisions: Islands” and “Geographic Headings and Subdivisions: Places on islands.”
Please note: “Commonwealth of Independent States” (political organisation formed by several former Soviet republics) is not valid as a subject heading, only as a name heading
The core area still referred to as Russia, the former Russian S.F.S.R., generally corresponds
to:
Russia (Federation)
Azerbaijan | (Azerbaijan S.S.R. is valid only as a name heading) | |
Belarus | (Byelorussian S.S.R. is valid only as a name heading) | |
Georgia (Republic) | (Georgian S.S.R. is valid only as a name heading) |
On the other hand, the names of some republics are used for places that have changed in extent over history, so earlier names are still valid as subject headings.
For use of Russian qualifiers and subdivisions, see:
Scope: This category includes
Please note:
Prior to 2005, botanical gardens were not treated as geographic headings (151) but only as corporate bodies (110). Older headings of this sort still exist.
Heading form: For those headings treated along the model of names of parks, certain special rules apply. While tagged as geographic headings and not truly jurisdictional headings, in some ways they are treated more as corporate headings. The heading should be:
Qualifiers, however, follow the standard patterns for qualifiers for geographic headings.
Cross-references are needed for variant forms, including:
Verifying and establishing geographic headings
The following sources should be consulted, generally in this order, until you have found an appropriate established heading in an authority file or until you have collected enough information from other sources to establish a heading.
Not an authoritative source, but a useful source of likely heading forms and variant forms for cross-references. Search also for the BGN form.
For jurisdictions: Search both as a subject heading and as a corporate name heading or the first part of a corporate name heading.
Not an authoritative source, but a useful source of likely heading forms and variant forms for cross-references. Search also for the BGN form.
For jurisdictions: Search both as a subject heading and as a corporate name heading or the first part of a corporate name heading.
The form of geographic name authorized by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN) is the one chosen for the heading form in most situations. To find BGN forms of names online:
Useful if a clear BGN form has not been found. Examples include:
top of this document | Local documentation list |
Geographic Headings and Subdivisions |
HTML document last reviewed: 16 October 2007; section "Verifying and establishing geographic headings" updated 22 April 2009